Bajrangi Bhaijan has actually gone to the other extreme in terms of
trying to convince Indian Hindus of the need to abandon any extremism and
embrace peace (overlooking the biases that it can subtly feed in Pakistani and even
other non-Indian audiences, and while many Indians may not know, Bollywood
movies are very popular in other South Asian countries, Southeast Asia, patrts
of Africa etc., and this film was screened in several international film
festivals too) of presenting every practising Hindu character in India as
casteist and Islamophobic (to the extent of not wanting to enter any mosque or durgah,
though many Hindus go to durgahs with much devotion and visit mosques, like the
Jama Masjid in Delhi, as tourist attractions, and while the protagonist
undergoes a change while remaining a practising Hindu, the heroine who changes
his outlook hasn’t been showcased as religious) and usually only having portrayed
a very traditionalist and mildly funny side of Hinduism in practice (like the
protagonist bowing before every other monkey, seeing him as representing Lord
Hanuman, which is not what usually even followers of Lord Hanuman do; they, at
the most, feed monkeys outside Hanuman temples but don’t fold their hands in
front of every monkey they encounter, and I know that the intention of the
film-makers in this context was only to entertain, not offend), which did make
me, as a Hindu, slightly uncomfortable, for there is and has been no dearth of
practising Hindus very tolerant to Muslims. Mahatma Gandhi was a practising
Hindu who was gunned down by a Hindu extremist (ironically, in spite of his
iconic status globally, as that of Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, there are many very
misconceptions floated about them today in South Asia by sections of the Hindu
right, Muslim right, economic right and even far-left, as I have discussed here and here),
Pujari Laldas was a temple priest known for his very tolerant
views when the hate-filled campaign for demolishing the Babri Masjid
was intensifying, many Hindu religious leaders have spoken up against Hindu
extremist violence as you can see here and here, a Hindu religious ceremony was
performed in a temple in Bihar in memory of the Muslim victim of the ghastly Dadri
episode and more recently, a Hindu temple in the South
Indian province of Kerala decided to postpone certain festivities owing to the
demise of a certain devout Muslim individual in the locality who had been
friends with many members of the temple committee.
But in Pakistan, the movie showed
no anti-Hindu bigotry, which is actually not the case. Not only is violence against
innocent Pakistani Hindus a reality but even otherwise, bigoted statements
against Hindus are made on television by ‘intellectuals’ like Zaid Hamid and
even a sports journalist can make a disgusting generalization about Hindus on
television (I recall a video of a female journalist asking a Pakistani
cricketer whether he wasn’t aware of the backstabbing psyche of Hindus, in the
wake of Pakistani cricketers not being included in the IPL, and this is not to
say that I seek to exaggerate minority victimhood in Pakistan, which is, in
fact, something I have opposed, as you can see in this article). A
madrasa maulvi saying ‘Jai Shri Ram’ as shown in Bajrangi Bhaijan is highly unlikely in reality, and of course, no
Muslim must necessarily be expected to say the same, just as no Hindu must
necessarily be expected to say ‘Allah-o-Akbar’, and tolerance is basically
about an attitude of ‘live and let live’, rather than having to necessarily
embrace the beliefs and practices of others. In its depiction of Pakistan, the
movie also showed no exploitation of girls (like the brothel they showed in
India) whatsoever, with only policemen rightly doing their job in trying to
arrest a man who came in without a visa, and the one senior officer who
tortures the protagonist could have been a nationalist bigot but no religious
angle was presented. However, on the whole, the film did a brilliant job of
promoting sensitivity and humanism across religious and nationalist barriers.
And yes, before someone misuses
the critical observation of mine to take digs at Salman Khan (as some Hindu
rightists rather unfairly did with Aamir Khan vis-à-vis pk, as I’ve discussed here), I must
emphasize that he wasn’t involved in the screenplay of the film. The film was
scripted by KV Vijayendra Prasad, who has presented a much better picture of
Hindu culture in his movie Bahubali,
and the director of the film, who was also involved in the screenplay, Kabir
Khan, has also made a film like Phantom
that’s very critical of Muslim extremism in Pakistan (and at the same time, not
in the least bigoted towards Pakistanis in general), and so, my critique is
only of Bajrangi Bhaijan as a film
without levelling any ad hominem
allegations. Also, I acknowledge that there are many beliefs and practices
among sections of both Hindus and Muslims, which need reformation, as
progressive people of both the communities have been trying (often by
suggesting that those beliefs and practices have come from a misinterpreted
understanding of the fundamental texts), and as for being very judgmental about
the other faith, it’s often a case of confirmation bias, as I’ve highlighted in
this short story
(please focus only on the dimension of being critical of other religions and
religious groupings, and not the other political dimensions of the story).
And before someone accuses me of
even bringing up this observation and acting spoilsport about a movie promoting
peace, I must clarify that I firmly believe that superficial talk of cultural
similarities and even some friendship between individuals cannot do much to
bring Indians and Pakistanis together in the larger picture, and so,
eradicating communal prejudices is vital, and we should indeed be willing to wholeheartedly
accept devout, practising Hindus and Muslims as not necessarily being
extremists (even if some of us, as apostates of either of the religions,
believe that the liberal, modern/post-modern interpretations of our former
religion are misplaced). The movie Filmistan has been much more realistic in its portrayal of Pakistan.
No comments:
Post a Comment